Yesterday saw publication of Campaign magazine's annual survey of the UK's 'top' agencies, commonly known as the 'school report'. For the second year in a row we scored an 'excellent' 8 out of a maximum possible 9 marks. Clearly, management has to take personal responsibility for that missing point. Here's what they wrote about us:
"W+K's reputation for creativity is well-earned but has in the past been based on work for a handful of accounts. Not before time the agency started to extend its canvas last year, bringing in significant new business including The Guardian and Lurpak butter. Add to those Cravendale milk, the Orange account in Romania and the launch of Brick-It (the first mobile phone soap series) and W+K begins to look like a more balanced operation.
Its creativity was widely recognised with awards. Its 'St Wayne' ad for Nike took the top honours at Campaign Posters. Meanwhile, its 2005 'Impossible Dream' film for Honda won Best Commercial at the British Television advertising awards, the third consecutive year a W+K spot for the carmaker has won the prize. The spot was also won of the most highly awarded in the world in 2006, according to the Gunn Report. All very satisfying. But in many ways the agency is a victim of its own success, since anything less than a Cannes Grand Prix looks like failure.
Sustaining this creative potency will be among the major challenges for W+K during the coming year, as will leveraging this strength with more international assignments.
Another will be to draft in more digital exprtise. While W+K should be commended for the investment, most of the growth in staff last year came as a result of a general beefing up of its creative department. The agency may be spoken of in the same breath as US hotshops such as Goodby Silverstein and Crispin Porter, but it has a way to travel if it is to match them below the line as well as above it."
We knew we did a good job last year but it's nice to see they were paying attention. Should we worry about how they rate us? One W+K staffer described a vote of approval from Camapign thus: 'It’s like getting whacked-off by the ugliest girl in school.'
For what it's worth, they also asked us to rate ourselves. We gave ourselves only 7 out of 9 and said, 'Steadily getting better but much more potential for us to achieve.'
Recent Comments